<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hashing vs. Digital Signatures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knikki.com/Index.php?feed=rss2&#038;p=4" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knikki.com/?p=4</link>
	<description>A blog about intrigue, espionage, hacking and absurdly overlooked errors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam</title>
		<link>http://knikki.com/?p=4&#038;cpage=1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knikki.com/?p=4#comment-3</guid>
		<description>If I understand this correctly, then as long as a have a digital signature (encrypting the hash with my private key, only to be unencrypted by using my matching public key) on a message, then I don&#039;t have to worry about the particular hashing algorithm itself, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand this correctly, then as long as a have a digital signature (encrypting the hash with my private key, only to be unencrypted by using my matching public key) on a message, then I don&#8217;t have to worry about the particular hashing algorithm itself, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
